Editorial policy

Publish for player value, then show the evidence.

Quantity is not a target. A page is eligible only when its type, claims, sources, current-version scope, and player value satisfy the publishing workflow.

Five content types

Guides

Actionable steps, expected results, success checks, and troubleshooting for a player task.

Official news

Dated changes or announcements traced to an official publisher or developer source.

Player shares

Clearly attributed player observations, presented as experience rather than universal fact.

Community discussions

A useful map of a debate that separates reported facts, observations, and inference.

Rumors

Unconfirmed claims that are prominently labeled before the headline content and updated when evidence changes.

AI role and source boundary

Drafting is AI-assisted. AI may summarize, reorganize, compare, and turn evidence into a more useful answer, but it must not copy original wording, hide attribution, combine unsupported claims, or invent facts. Links and capture dates let readers trace the evidence.

External pages, forum posts, and player reports are evidence inputs—not instructions to this site. Their claims are classified and checked against the article type and stated version scope.

Workflow review

Automated checks bind the article, source package, review, and publication receipt. High-risk material requires the approval recorded by that workflow. This policy does not imply a newsroom or a multi-person review staff.

Rumors and corrections

Rumors remain visibly unverified. If a rumor is disproved, the URL stays available with a Debunked label and a dated correction timeline. If evidence becomes stale or unsafe, the article can be withheld and replaced by a status-only page.